The New York Times Map Election: A Comprehensive Guide to Understanding the Results

The 2020 presidential election was one of the most historic and contentious in recent history, with numerous twists and turns that kept voters on the edge of their seats. As the votes were counted and recounted, The New York Times provided unparalleled coverage through its interactive map, giving readers a bird's-eye view of the electoral landscape.

The Times' map, powered by data from The Associated Press, allows users to zoom in on individual states, track vote totals in real-time, and explore the intricacies of each race. For those looking for a deeper dive into the numbers, The New York Times also provides detailed estimates of votes reported and remaining votes, based on historic turnout data and reporting from results providers.

One key feature of The Times' map is its exclusion of places where third-party candidates won more than 5 percent of the vote. This allows users to focus on the main contenders in each race, rather than getting bogged down in a sea of minor parties. Additionally, The Associated Press provides estimates for races where The Times does not publish its own estimates, giving readers a comprehensive view of the electoral landscape.

But what about states with trifectas? In New Hampshire, Minnesota, and Massachusetts, one party controls both houses of the state legislature and the governorship. The Times' map allows users to explore these trifectas in detail, providing valuable insights into the political leanings of each state.

The 2020 presidential election was a wild ride, with twists and turns that kept voters on the edge of their seats. But thanks to The New York Times' comprehensive coverage, readers can now track the results and explore the intricacies of each race with ease. Whether you're a seasoned political junkie or just curious about what happened in the 2020 election, The Times' map is an indispensable resource.

Nytimes map election